While reading Konrad Seitz’s book on China, I also looked up the one or other reference. One pointed towards work from Henry Kissinger, which also included a debate from 2011 on the question: “Will the 21st Century Belong to China?”.


I ordered the transcript and the talk is available online here: http://www.munkdebates.com/debates/china


About the munk debates:
“The semi-annual Debates were established in 2008 as a charitable initiative of the Aurea Foundation co-founders Peter and Melanie Munk. The Debates take place in Toronto in the evening in front of an audience of 3,000 people at Roy Thomson Hall. The Debates last approximately an hour and a half. Two panelists argue for a debate style motion and two against. The format is short opening statements followed by a civil and substantive moderated panel discussion, followed by short closing statements. Past participants include Henry Kissinger, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Krugman, Fareed Zakaria, Tony Blair, Christopher Hitchens and Larry Summers, among others. The Debates are broadcast throughout Canada by the CBC and across the continental United States on C-SPAN. The transcript of each debate is published as a book in Canada by House of Anansi Press and internationally.”


Overall, the debate gives a unique insight into how a diverse set of four “China shapers” think about it China and its future. These people give opinions politics and economy and their opinions are highly valued. It’s incredibly interesting to see opinions of well received individuals clash. The debate is only about two hours, so there is only an exchange on issues on the surface, but, still, it offers information available nowhere else.

It just strikes me as unresponsible to build a nation's future on statements such as "China's tank is still not empty" and "The Chinese people will at least double their efforts and have lots of things up their sleeves". It is just pure emotional speculation. I do not understand, yet, where David Li, one of the speakers, wants to go with this. I really don't know.

After keeping this book on my reading list for way too long, I have finally come around to read it.
Overall, it is an objection of the Gaussian normal distribution as the SOLE natural probability distribution. The fractal by Mandelbrot is one suggested alternative. Nothing to see here people, move along. (Or I might have misread the book. There are plenty of interesting statements in there, but I think this one is the main message)

It is also a philosophy book with popular tendencies which also became quite popular. A bit odd in that sense I guess. Nassim  draws on a lot of philosophies and philosophers to make his point which is a good thing if you believe in method of building your own work on other people’s literature (which makes you prone to group thing, but you have to start somewhere).


I could hardly detect any “hate” or “shouting voice” while reading the book. His arguments seemed overall valid to me, but I can see how quite a number of people might be offended by his painful but true statements. I personally thought it to be rather entertaining, having a good laugh every 20 pages or so.

It is about 300 pages and reads relatively well if you are interested in philosophy and the venture of trying to understand uncertainty.

If I was to use his argument in my adventure of explaining the world, I definitely would have to read the book at least one more time. With such a peculiar matter as uncertainty and the stringing together of quite a number of arguments it is easy to make mistakes and misinterpret the matter.


10/10, would read again.

As part of my personal studies on China, I have finished reading a 470 page long book on China called “China: Eine Weltmacht kehrt zurück”. As far as I know, this book has also been published in English, but somehow I cannot find any references to that. Also, there seem to be contradicting publication dates out there, but I think it must have been published in 2000. This has several implications such as that there is no 9/11 discussion, predictions which can be tested for more than 15 years (so beginning 2000) and the impact of the internet is hardly discussed.


I think it is a well written book which enables a thorough introduction in the history of China, going all the way back to the dynasties and how these evolved to what China is today. Most important for that is the discussion of the moral values and political attitudes of the Chinese people and how they changed over time. China is just not as simple as “Dynasty-Mao-Deng-Xiaoping”. Multiple steps took place to make the country what it is today.


The book discusses the historical background in the first few hundred pages and then continues with political and economic critique. At about 70% it lost its breath a bit, but finished overall good.


I recommend this book for when you are interested in understanding China a little bit better and for when you are looking for a detailed introduction to the country from a global politics perspective.

At the beginning of July I attended a 3 day conference on computations sustainability, the so called CompSust-2016 4th International Conference on Computational Sustainability (http://www.compsust.net/compsust-2016/) I presented the paper “Text-Mining the Signals of Climate Change Doubt” by Constantine Boussalis and Travis Coan.


I loved it.


There were talks in the morning and afternoon with great networking breaks in between: http://www.compsust.net/compsust-2016/program.php. The topics were by nature quite interdisciplinary. Generally, everyone applied the one or other computational method to a problem of sustainability. The conference concluded with a panel on Expanding the Horizons of Computational Sustainability which gave a great insight into how people things will go and how things will be pushed further. The poster sessions were extremely helpful as well and I had at least ten immensely rewarding conversations.

Sustainability is an important concept. I think it makes sense that there are systems in this universe which have a certain threshold which, when passed, there is no going back. The most prominent one is probably the threshold of runaway climate change, when the CO2 levels reach an irreversible level. But there are sustainability issues in all areas. For example, governments and societies have a threshold of disagreement. If too many people do not agree with the government they will go on streets and protest for a change, sometimes violently.

Now, if you take a step back and take a higher level perspective, then you can observe that countries with high rates of protests more or less move economically slower. Military coups are another source of economics slow down. People need to figure out if a revolution is worth the short-term loss for the estimated long-term gain. If there are too many revolutions, there certainly cannot be long-term growth. I think, that is what China is trying to prevent. Too many demonstrations would be bad for the economy so measures, sometimes harsh but certainly vast, are taken to prevent demonstrations. Sustainability is close the the idea of trade-offs. We need to give up A now to achieve B in the future. Sustainability is especially a problem with humans which tend to prefer short-term gain over long-term gain only then to suffer in the future. That is also part of the learning process. The planet earth is finite. Resources are finite. Human patience is finite. One needs to find the most efficient path through this forrest of complex decisions. Algorithms maybe can help with that. More to come!


I spent some time before and after the conference in Manhattan. I was able to put in two 13ish-mile-runs at central park which is such a nice place especially with all the water fountains. I also met up with people I had met at the conference days before. New York is unique, there is no denying. Also, who knew Staten Island ferry is FREE OF CHARGE? Amazing, right? 

Also, Ithaca is such a nice place in the summer. Great nature, great weather, great pictures, see the first picture.

I just finished reading “Superforecasting” by Philip Fetlock. He initiated the Good Judgement Project, “a multi-year study of the feasibility of improving the accuracy of probability judgments of high-stakes, real-world events”. The project came first in the forecasting challenge by the IARPA, a US intelligence community observer.


The book, in the first part, covers the results of the Good Judgement Project in an interesting not over-academic way. The conclusion of the project, at least from my perspective, is that you should never think binary and always in the Bayesian way. If you are familiar with Bayesian statistic, you will feel that the whole project will culminate in the Bayesian rule already after having the first ten pages. The participants of the forecasting project are described, what they do and what their results are. 


I thought it to be interesting that Fetlock never explicitly states that these participants are just building intuition based Bayesian models of the world which allows them to generate more fine grained forecasts. For me, the book basically summed up an understanding of the world I was familiar with before, but with different words and some empiric evidence. Very useful.


I very much appreciated the remarks in the last chapter about the limits of quantification. I want to cover these in my Bachelor thesis, so this book definitely will get a reference or two.


Overall, this book is a very good read and one more piece of a puzzle called uncertainty I am trying to solve. Recommend. Approx. 18 hours.

Today, I finished my last class of an intensive course in Chinese. For 6 days I commuted to the Konfuzius Institute in Munich in the morning, had lunch after 135 minutes of Chinese, followed by another 135 minutes of Chinese.


It was great! I love it. Learning a new language feels like so many things. Like a new life. Like visiting a foreign country. Like getting to know a completely unfamiliar way of thought. Like a new philosophy. Like committing to a years long adventure. Like doing something you are really bad at, but still liking it.


I decided to continue my studies of Chinese after my visit to Zhejiang University in March. China is massive. Anyone who is not familiar with China is definitely missing out. The same principles holds for Africa or India or Russia or South America. As a European it is easy to reduce the global playground to Europe and USA and, well, this other thing called China. But there is so much more. In fact, there seems to be more than in Europe and the US combined. Yes, the US and EU economy is stronger and more stable compared to the Chinese, but that is the past and things will NOT stay the same in the future. 


Again, it is easy to assume that the world is the world is now and will be fairly similar in the future. But that is wrong — very wrong. The players of this planet are the US, EU and China and many more countries. Reducing your perspective to English speaking countries can hurt you. The best way to engage with another country is to learn its language. 


I want to understand China and its culture. The history of China is very interesting and also significant for its economic and politics future. Getting to know China’s language is probably the best way to understand the country and its people. That is why I want to continue studying Chinese. I already signed up for a year long course during my next two semesters. It’s fun. So much fun!


I recommend anyone to learn a new language, to take the courage of this crazy adventure. Learning a new language is most (non-lazy) human thing there is: trying to make sense of something you do not understand. It will challenge your daily routines and your long-term thought. It’s a certain gain, it is a sure bet. That’s why I study Chinese. :)

ASo, this is the story how I went to Shanghai for two days. Sit back, relax and enjoy the show.


After my Hong Kong trip I had planned another two days of Shanghai before I return to the UK. Even though I only got a single entry visa I was aware of a “city-visa” rule which allows you to stay in big Chinese cities such as Shanghai for up to 72 hours if you have an international flight after that time.


So, on Thursday I arrived back to Mainland China (sigh) and had to make my way through immigration. Well, the immigration officer was familiar with the term, but the had to call his supervisor to handle all the transit visa stuff. I had to sit down in a room for 10 minutes and they came back with my passport with a custom stamp. So far so good, my Shanghai trip could have stopped there already! I made my way to the exit and as always, there was soooooo many scammers at luggage exit. I do not know who runs this airport, but I am pretty sure they have not been there often in the last months. Scammers introduce themselves as airport staff. I’ve been through this exit before the first time I entered China and I should have guessed that there is more (because there was more, see below!)


Shanghai has a magnetic based train from the airport to (roughly) the city center called “Maglev”. I think it is a German engineering project which only the Chinese government was willing to pay for (Germany never built a single on in Germany itself). I paid 40 园 yuan, so roughly £5 for a 15 minute 180miles per hour ride into Shanghai. I liked it. It was quite noisy for a train which is supposed to have a super low friction. There were a lot of Chinese people on there and it was easy to spot that this was a upper-class commodity.


I had to change to Line 2 to go to my hostel at Jingan Temple (?). At the ticket machine I met a student from Hong Kong going to the same hotel so we joined forces on the way to there. At the hotel I met Jannis from StudyChina and we had a late night dinner with the student from Hong Kong. We found a place which had INCREDIBLE Chinese food. It was so good that I actually returned on Sunday. Emma was right, you get the best Chinese food in the smallest no-brand places with mediocre hygiene rating. I went to bed and planned to grab breakfast with Jannis the next morning before he boarded his plane at noon.


After some 5 hours of sleep I already had to get on my way to Jannis. I had an hour of walking from west Shanghai to somewhere at People’s Square. I saw a good portion of the city and it really looks consumer driven. A lot of shops and lot of expensive shops. Fancy advertisements. Clean streets, at least the main ones.


We had breakfast and then Jannis already went his way. Sadness. He recommended me some places to go to and so I did. Because I only had 5 hours of sleep and basically none because TWO out of my 3 roommates where DEAFENING SNORERS. I was really tired and should have gone back to the hostel to get some more sleep. 


This was my FIRST MISTAKE that day which would culminate in a near-catastrophe. Keep reading.


So, I went to the National Museum of China just around the corner of People’s Square. They had four floors of Chinese history and culture. I learned a lot about art and history and the people, but could not really take away a lot from it because I was so tired. Several times I had to take a seat to take rest. I am stupid. I know.


Next up was walking further east towards The Bund, which is the place where all tourist take their pictures. I walked further down Ninjiang road, a road with more shops than any other city I have seen in my life. I got lunch at starbucks and slept there for an hour or something (they had very comfy seats!).


I arrived at The Bund around 2 o’clock and it was a good view, not lying. I went up and then back down and then on the other side, the financial center (?). You know, you can see all this stuff on google, there is nothing big to say really. 


Because all Shanghai pictures are taken during night when all the towers light up pretty, I went back to the other side.


THIS IS WHERE THINGS WENT WRONG. Let me start by telling you the story from the perspective I experienced it the first time and after that we can reflect on what happened. I try to get all details right. Stay with me.


I left East Ninjiang Subway station and had a map in my hand to check wether I need to go left or right to get to The Bund. I turned left and turned right. I think actually had figured out where to go already. A girl and her friend walked past me (not a coincidence) and she asked me where I a want to go. I said “The Bund for the view”. She said, oh yes, she can point me that way and asked “Where are you from?” I said I am from Germany. She said “Ah, i see, so you are here for business?”. I said no. I am a student. We started walking towards the bund and I asked her where she is from and what she is doing here in Shanghai. She said she is studying English and from a province a train hour away from Thailand (between China and Thailand you either need to pass Laos or Burma, I don’t know how this makes sense. she also said it’s only a three hour train ride from Shanghai. Once again, that would be a bit too short.)


She said that she and her friend, who was in the city for business, do want to go out tonight and if I wanted join for some drinks. Sure, I said, because I did not have any idea what else to do that night and having some locals (or at least something close to a local) on your side might prove helpful in navigating and managing the place. Well, we walked further and I said that we maybe want to go somewhere else, because this streets looks expensive. No response. Ok, so we go into a lounge of one of the many shopping buildings and into an elevator. We get out on a fifth floor restaurant which looked average and sat down with a window view over Ninjiang road. The girl order three saki shots and a coke and I ordered a tea. I thought “Oh wow, it’s not even 8pm. They are rushing. I guess that is part of their culture. Better not confront but play along.” So I did.


They were quite nice to talk to (or pretending to do so at least) and I got to learn the one or other Chinese word. The one girl, who I now will call the leading girl (she introduced herself as “Shainxi”, any native speakers know what that means? Maybe something like “seamer”?. The other girl was called “mei”, which she said means “flower”. 


So the leading girl was quite upfront and said she wants to party to night, because she broke up with there boyfriend a month ago. I said, “a month, how long was the relationship?”. She said “One year”. I said “Oh, ok so it was no super serious.” Weird looks from the girls.


Her friend suggested that the prettiest babies are Chinese German as she can tell from her friend. I say “Ok, I don’t think that there is a correlation and I have never seen any so …”. They keep pushing.


“Come on, Jakob. Have some fun with us tonight!” They repeatedly raise their saki glasses and I tag along, because CULTURE. 


I am taking it slow on the drinking and balance it with my tea. The leading girl finishes her saki early and orders another one, having almost forced me to get another one as well, but I refused.


She drinks some and then puts a half into my glass. What do I do? I guess I have to drink it. I am not a trained drinker at all and I start to feel the effects, but I am still thinking ok. So, the girls wanna go and I say, sure let’s get the bill.


The bill comes around. 708 YUAN. 7-0-8. I am bit shocked. Maybe they did a mistake. Something is fishy here! The girls look at me and expect me to pay. I am like “Ah, no, let’s split!” They pretend like they did not understand. I get a pen and make the calculation. They are like


“Oh, noo, nononono!”
“We don’t have money”


Oh, ok. I am thinking. Well, I guess if they are “poor” Chinese students I can take some one me. I ask them to give them all the money they have. The one friend shows me some 240 yuan. I want to take it, but then she says, nononono. 40 Yuan for Taxi. I am like, ok, if she says so. 


But then, she gives the 200 Yuan to the waiter. Why would she give the 200 Yuan to the waiter instead of me? Why would she do that? Well, the reason is easy. The bill is not us three against the restaurant. It’s me against the restaurant and its two professional scammers. They get a provision for each single saki shot which was ordered for a whopping £15. (I only understood that fact later, at that point I still assumed that it’s the restaurant against us, but I also knew these girls were dangerous.)


So, it was at that point that he knew he had f*cked up. 


BAIL. NOW.


Because I did not want the girls to know that I wanted to leave ASAP, I played along and pretended that I am fine with paying 500 yuan for some shots and a tea. I typed in my PIN code for my visa card (they were very attentive at that moment…) and we left. We left the building and I said I had to take a call. They were (pretending to be) sad and I made my way to the subway station. They wanted to give goodbye hugs (and roll a last scam on me). The leading girl jumped in front of me and hugged me wholeheartedly, while the other one was out of my sight. Well, TOO BAD JAKOB DOES NOT STORE ANY VALUABLE GOODS IN HIS BACK POCKETS BECAUSE I COULD FEEL THAT YOUR HANDS COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING, YOU THIEF!


I escaped into the subway. On the way to the hostel. I slowly realised what had just happened. I also realised that scam artist that involve alcohol also involve other drugs, so I needed to get to a safe place ASAP, because I don’t know what they potentially had done to my drinks. (They luckily did not get that far). I arrived at the hostel, drank a lot of water and started ranting on the StudyChina (unofficial) WeChat group (sorry my friends, but I was in shock!).


Ok, all good so far. Let us examine how this could go so wrong.


A) I was very tired that day. I was slow to think and slow to think ahead.
B) During past travels I have meet strangers on the street. All these strangers, mostly students, I could verify from where they were coming from and going to that they were not a threat. These girls introduced themselves as students. I failed to filed this properly. They knew I would not expect anything bad from students. They went with the role I am familiar with and trust as a student: students.
C) I WAS looking for something to do that night. They offered a solution to this problem. I saw an easy fix.


Ok, REEEEEEEEWIND.


Let’s do this story again. But this time, I am will point out all the hints I should have gotten that something was wrong.


Their stories were not cohesive. They improvised them. And they verified them on the go by talking Chinese. From time to time they would switch to Chinese and talk very professional and straight to the point. When I told them I know some Chinese. They never spoke Chinese to each other again. They probably feared I would be able to guess that they were scheming to scam me right in front of my in Chinese.


They were acting as a team. They leading Chinese girl was always jumping ahead and drinking fast while the other one was bringing here back down. These were not their characters. These were their roles. The leading character was supposed to look like a girl I could stay the night with (while they then take all my valuables, phone, credit card of which the PIN they could read before and my watch when I was passed out either by alcohol or by their drugs).


The leading Chiense girl was very confident. She has done this before. A lot. The other girl was a bit shy. She was new to the game. Here role play was also not that great. In fact, the leading girl had to plot here character out many times. She was talking for her friend. I thought that her friend was shy. In fact, her friend just was a bad actor.


So, how sophisticated were they? Sophisticated, but not sophisticated enough to take all things I had. I was lucky to get away with 500 yuan. I could have been much worse.


How was I so stupid? Well, as soon as they introduced themselves as students, they were trustworthy for me.


What is the learning? Never, ever trust a stranger. Even more, never expose yourself as a target. I was a Westerner in China. I had a fancy watch (it really is not, but they think so). For scammers, I look like business. This isn’t just a lesson for travelling, it is a lesson for life. Most people will go for money, always. There are few exceptions. 


THIS IS ALSO NOT ABOUT CHINA. This can happen to you anywhere, probably most likely in places where you obviously are easy to exploit, but still. 


I hope this benefits someone else who is reading this. I was very down after this experience. I went through the stages of shock, realisation, fear, anger, more anger, angerangeranger. It had a big impact on my China experience. 


My China experience was amazing to this point. This whole thing reversed my experience 180 degrees. But overall, i think I should be happy. Again, this was a bad travel experience which coincided with a stay in China. Yes, China maybe has more scammers, but really this should not have a dominant impact on my stay there. This is how I see it now and I hope you can understand why.


Finally, a poll:

ALSO, here is another story, which is just another very interesting variation of this scam:
https://vimeo.com/6942629
Thanks, Fredrik Lind, for sharing!

The StudyChina program had concluded on Friday evening, so on Saturday morning we got shuttles to Shanghai Pudong Airport for our flights. The majority of students went back to the UK for University work, but some stayed some time longer for travel. I chose to go to Hong Kong for 5 nights.


Hong Kong is close and cheap to get to from Shanghai. It is a decent three hour flight and I arrived in the evening at about 6pm. Because Hong Kong technically is part of China, you would assume it is similar to China. Well, YOU ARE WRONG. Hong Kong is everything except China.


It used to be British colony and you need to treat it like that. Hong Kong is like London New York mixture on a Stockholm island formation where by chance mostly Chinese people are living on. It is more Western than most Eastern European countries. You have an incredibly infrastructure. Highly efficient transport, well planned living and people are as polite as the British!


So, I effectively had 4 days to spend and get the most out of Hong Kong. Unfortunately, the weather was very cloudy and foggy, so I did not do any of the walking tours on the hills, but only stayed in the city. On Sunday, I visited the local Saddleback church and it was only there that I realised that all Hong Kong people one or the other education are very good speakers of the English language. It literally felt like the UK, because it technically used to be the UK. Yes, they were handed over to China some 25 years ago, but they do not look and feel like it. Theses Chinese people have tasted freedom and they are not going to give it back. It is as easy as that. For the rest of Sunday I walked around Central on Hong Kong island and took a double decker tram (!) to the east.


On Monday, I went to Macau with Adam from StudyChina who also was staying in Hong Kong. Macau is another special administrative region of China, and a former Portuguese colony. It really is just a Las Vegas clone in Asia. We got there at about noon and left at about 8pm. We saw Chinese people gamble away my tuition of three years in at least three casinos in less than 5 minutes. I have never seen so much pain in a man’s face, haha. They all had fun for some seconds and then they suffered — a lot. Casino cities are weird and you never really find a meaning to them, because they do not have a meaning. Everything is tailored towards you gambling. Everything. It was fun in the beginning, but it got really boring in the end, because it was just about taking money from rich bored people (Chinese business man) to other rich bored people (the casino owners). Nothing else to see there.


On Tuesday, I went to the local Science and Technology Museum which was very good. They had shows on both the Hadron Collider AND Climate Change and both were very well executed. I had pizza with my amazing AirBnB host in the evening.


On Wednesday, I met with a friend who did an exchange semester at Exeter University last September. We had sushi (sooooo good in Hong Kong!) at Central. I planned to go to two museums that day, but somehow failed to find the way to each and ende up just walking around campus and Hong Kong. You cannot always get what you want.


On Thursday, it was already time to leave for another two days of Shanghai. Unfortunately (or fortunately?) my flight was delayed by 5 hours, so I could go into Hong Kong for some more time. I bought some outlet shoes and had a sandwich. 


Overall, I really enjoyed going to Hong Kong and I think that any China experience without Hong Kong is a very skewed experience. Hong Kong is part of China, but so much different. It will reverse any expectations you have of China and give a PROPER picture of all the kind of people you meet in Asia.

This was the last week of the StudyChina program and it was fairly quiet, so not a lot of excursions which means more free time to spend by yourself! We still had Chinese classes every day in the morning and because we had to do at least 12 chapters we had to rush through 4 chapters in two days, because we were not able to cover them before. That was quite intense, but I guess you need to pick up speed sooner or later anyway!


After the extended weekend, classes started again on Tuesday. We also had a speaker from Generation UK who talked about scholarships for all kind of program levels, though, as I am not British citizen I am not eligible for this kind of support so I did not go there. I think on Tuesday afternoon I was doing some work for University or some other project, but either way I took it slow.


On Wednesday, we had our last culture class and we continued with all things business. We covered the laws and how Chinese businesses work with them. I cannot remember too much actually, but, as always, it was quite interesting how different the Chinese state does things.


On Thursday, we had a free afternoon as well and Oliver and I took up the offer from Fang for a museum visit. We went to the national (!) museum of tea which was nearby and saw all the different kinds of tea (there are so many!). It was very interesting and we even had a tea tasting (I think Fang set that up for us) with all the ceremony and things. In the end, I bought some Jasmine tea which is something like a flower you put into hot water which then expands and looks really, really nice. In the evening we went to a Sichuan Hotpot meal with the Chinese volunteer students. You have two “hotspots” in the middle of the table which are heated up. One is just hot water and the other one is chilli water which over time gets very, very spicy (I do not know how exactly, but it gets reaaaaally spicy). You order lots of different food and put it into the hotpot which surprisingly cooks the food very fast. Also, sharing food is the common way to go out for dinner. You order different bits and everyone can take them into their own little bowl. It’s very different to the European way of going out for a dinner, but also a very fun one! Finally, in the end we took a nice group photo and went back to the campus.


Friday was our last official day at the University and of the program as a whole. We had language classes in the morning, though, because we had our exam already on Thursday morning, we were discussing Chinese culture with our teacher, who was incredibly nice and brought us each a single gift! We also rehearsed our performance for the closing ceremony and the afternoon was once again free. The ceremony began in a local hotel at about 5pm and we had typical Chinese food on a round table and soon after we heard some speeches. After that each class had its performance, beginning with class A, my class. With these things, it is always a definite yes or definite no of how and even if people participate. Luckily, everyone joined in and we did have a great time. At about 8, the ceremony closed (we also got our certificates for the courses and all) and we went back to campus. 


So, we had one night left in Hangzhou, what do you do? Well, we decided to go up to Laohe Shan one last time. I organised a group, we went to the shop before and then headed up. I remember that there was a gate which was open during and the day and I feared it might be closed during the night. Well, it was closed! When we arrived, we saw a Chinese couple on the other side trying to get out. We actually managed to get her out by beding the gates against each other, but he was stuck. Long story short, someone had the idea to just lift the gate. NOT KIDDING. The gate had a big chain and was all locked, but you could just lift it and put it on the side. This basically describes my whole experience of China, haha. Everything is well done (or copied from somewhere else), but due to the missing understanding of the concept behind something, the quality is lacking. It might sound a bit “Western” to say that and it’s always easy to point out mistake instead of pointing out things which are well done. But this concept of copying without the deeper understanding stems from an agenda coming from the top. Just last week, the Chinese government announced a plan to become the world’s best football country by 2050. They will invest money and they will train a lot of Chinese football players and pick the best. But, as long as they do not import the intellectual property, the understanding of how to win at football, just copying the appearance will not be enough. (China has been successful with these strategy at the olympics, so it does work here or there). Once again, it’s easy to point out mistakes and I am very interested in how Chinese people think of Europe and the US and if they can see any “mistakes” there.


ANYWAY, we lifted the gate and switched sites with the Chinese couple who just looked at us in disbelief. We made our way up to the top (some 800 steps) and enjoyed the (unfortunately polluted) view of the campus and all around. It was fascinating to see the city from the top at night. You could spot all the big places, West Lake and the temple. We descended at about 11pm and sooner or later went to sleep, because our shuttle left at 6am.


This is it. These where the three weeks of StudyChina UK at Zhejiang University. I did not put much effort into reviewing the things I wrote so these articles are my honest and authentic opinion I would tell you if you would ask me on the street. I COULD go on and discuss all the little details and the politics and the business and the people. And I might do in the future. But I wanted to separate my off the top of my head experience from the reflections, because that way it is easier to enjoy the fun bits and more effective and helpful to discuss the details.


My trip did not end there, I went on to Hong Kong and Shanghai for two days, see the other articles!